Harman's packaged browser solution sounds like a good one to me, and we'll contact them for getting a trial and pricing.

So, with this scenario, we are evaluating options. Unfortunately we won't end doing this by January 2021. I agree that migrating to other technology is the optimal solution but it's a big application highly customized and with internal developments based on Flex. Configured thoughtfully, they may help to reduce the attack surface for enterprises that are simply not able to remove their dependencies on Flash Player in the short term. They are not a panacea, nor are they a substitute for following the important security best-practice of running current, actively maintained software. The whitelist options provide some additional tools to engineers trying to solve these types of problems for their specific applications. Virtualization solutions for creating isolated, ephemeral desktop environments that expose specific internal applications to modern clients come to mind. To do it well requires careful thought, engineering and money. There's a whole industry built around running legacy software securely in enterprise environments. Where that's simply not feasible, the whitelist option allows administrators to reduce the attack surface by restricting Flash Player to only loading content from a whitelist however, simply setting some whitelist options and walking away is not a great plan (nor is it likely to be sufficient, depending on what browser(s) your company uses). You can find more about that program here:

If you absolutely must use Flash Player in your organization after EOL, this is the best option. The optimal solution is to migrate to technologies that don't use Flash before the end of the year.įor enterprises that absolutely must run Flash Player beyond the end-of-life date, they can work with our technology partner Harman to license a solution that will meet their needs.

Best browser with flash player